Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 30A10026MH

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.72% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive19.6% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemLenovo 30A10026MH  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO SHARKBAY
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140126
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 09 '18 at 07:13
Run Duration106 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1220 v3-$150
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
75.5% Very good
Memory 87.9
1-Core 101
2-Core 196
74% 128 Pts
4-Core 362
8-Core 384
49% 373 Pts
64-Core 389
24% 389 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 75.5%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
Gigabyte(1458 36F9) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 384.76
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
3.72% Terrible
Lighting 4.4
Reflection 4.31
Parallax 4.19
4% 4.3 fps
MRender 3.95
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 6.13
4% 4.66 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.72%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 128GB-$150
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 6B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
19.6% Very poor
Read 253
Write 109
Mixed 145
37% 169 MB/s
4K Read 2.67
4K Write 2.79
4K Mixed 2.57
9% 2.68 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 19.6%
Great: 110%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
902GB free
Firmware: 1A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 193
Write 180
Mixed 165
135% 179 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.88
4K Mixed 0.36
148% 1.51 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 107%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451U6AFR8C-PB Kingston 9905584-014.A00LF 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
58.4% Above average
MC Read 21.3
MC Write 21.9
MC Mixed 18.3
59% 20.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 18.1
SC Mixed 17.3
47% 16.5 GB/s
Latency 69.7
57% 69.7 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $275WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback