Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 80Q5

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 26%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.31% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 80Q5  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Lenovo G70-35
Memory4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150724
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 29 '18 at 19:20
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD E1-6010 APU R2 Graphics
Socket FT3b, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.35 GHz, turbo 1.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
28.5% Poor
Memory 50.9
1-Core 19.9
2-Core 39.1
26% 36.6 Pts
4-Core 38
8-Core 38.1
5% 38 Pts
64-Core 38.2
2% 38.2 Pts
Poor: 8%
This bench: 28.5%
Great: 30%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R2 Graphics
Legend(17AA 3810) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 16.6
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
1.31% Terrible
Lighting 1.37
Reflection 3.12
Parallax 1.69
1% 2.06 fps
MRender 2.48
Gravity 1.03
Splatting 2.57
2% 2.02 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.31%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB
608GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2BA30001 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
54.2% Above average
Read 91.4
Write 97.2
Mixed 95.1
71% 94.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.43
4K Write 1.95
4K Mixed 0.15
71% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 54.2%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C9S3L/4G RMT3170ME68F9F1600 8GB
800, 800 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
13.6% Very poor
MC Read 4.8
MC Write 3.2
MC Mixed 5
12% 4.33 GB/s
SC Read 3.6
SC Write 3.7
SC Mixed 4.8
12% 4.03 GB/s
Latency 157
25% 157 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 13.6%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 80Q5 Builds (Compare 40 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 80Q5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $23
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback