Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

ADD TO PC
BUILD

Toshiba SATELLITE L850D-12U

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Toshiba SATELLITE L850D-12U (all builds)
Motherboard	AMD PLCSC8
Memory	4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20121002
Uptime	5.7 Days
Run Date	Jan 23 '18 at 13:57
Run Duration	86 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A10-4600M APU 5,886 User benchmarks, average bench 43% Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	46.5% Average	Memory 68.9 1-Core 44.1 2-Core 86.7 43% 66.6 Pts	4-Core 143 8-Core 141 19% 142 Pts	64-Core 135 8% 135 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 46.5% Great: 51%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7660G 4,227 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Toshiba(1179 FB3B) 512MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004 Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Lighting 6.17 Reflection 7.54 Parallax 6.81 5% 6.84 fps	Splatting 7.48 8% 7.48 fps
Poor: 3% Great: 5%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ01ABD075 750GB-$40 42,694 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 590GB free (System drive) Firmware: AX003M Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 1690 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 6149 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 80 80 8288 (0A) Spinup retry count 220 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 5839 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 594 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 386 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 89 89 114350 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 219044184101 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 32 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (DC) Disk shift 100 100 0 (DE) Loaded hours 82 82 7526 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0 (E0) Load friction 100 100 0 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 180 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0	53.6% Above average	Read 96.3 Write 90.5 Mixed 88.3 69% 91.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.21 4K Mixed 0.2 61% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 53.6% Great: 57%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown PRINCETON Samsung M471B5173BH0-CK0 8GB 39 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 800, 800 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	27.8% Poor	MC Read 13.6 MC Write 5.6 MC Mixed 9.1 27% 9.43 GB/s	SC Read 7.4 SC Write 6.1 SC Mixed 9.7 22% 7.73 GB/s	Latency 104 38% 104 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 27.8% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155	Nvidia RTX 4060 $299	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $230	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback