Today's hottest deals

Asrock B560M-C

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics34.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive93.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock B560M-C  (all builds)
Memory17.9 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210208
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 05 '24 at 23:41
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10400F-$94
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
87.6% Excellent
Memory 90.1
1-Core 121
2-Core 243
85% 152 Pts
4-Core 458
8-Core 755
74% 606 Pts
64-Core 964
60% 964 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 87.6%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX 480
Asus(1043 04FB) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1310 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 24.9.1
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
34.1% Below average
Lighting 38.9
Reflection 58.5
Parallax 53.7
32% 50.4 fps
MRender 58.6
Gravity 41.8
Splatting 43.9
39% 48.1 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 34.1%
Great: 52%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GB
49GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 415020WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 241 203 204 206 205 212 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
93.2% Outstanding
Read 414
Write 406
Mixed 345
SusWrite 212
77% 344 MB/s
4K Read 35.1
4K Write 84
4K Mixed 45.3
156% 54.8 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 313
DQ Mixed 246
212% 313 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 93.2%
Great: 111%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 CMK16GX4M2A2400C16 CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 24GB
2133, 2400, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
68.6% Good
MC Read 25.1
MC Write 26.7
MC Mixed 20.1
68% 24 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 27.4
SC Mixed 22.1
61% 21.3 GB/s
Latency 66.6
60% 66.6 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 68.6%
Great: 91%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 22" 1280 720 ONN0000 100002480
Typical B560M-C Builds (Compare 4,382 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 100%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asrock B560M-C

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $281
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback