Today's hottest deals

Asus P5N-E SLI

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.71% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus P5N-E SLI  (all builds)
Memory6.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20091118
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 18 '18 at 00:06
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 6600-$90
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.05 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
50.6% Above average
Memory 90.1
1-Core 34.9
2-Core 69.1
46% 64.7 Pts
4-Core 69.7
8-Core 70
9% 69.8 Pts
64-Core 70.3
4% 70.3 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 43%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 4670
Sapphire(174B E101) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.1100
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
4.71% Terrible
Lighting 5.8
Reflection 8.58
Parallax 3.81
5% 6.06 fps
MRender 5.48
Gravity 3.2
Splatting 7.7
5% 5.46 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.71%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST3500830AS 500GB-$145
12GB free
Firmware: 3.AA
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
27.6% Poor
Read 47.7
Write 48.2
Mixed 46.5
36% 47.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.65
4K Write 1.18
4K Mixed 0.41
95% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 27.6%
Great: 44%
Seagate ST3120023A 120GB-$42
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.30 Max speed: UDMA 100 100 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
12.3% Very poor
Read 21.6
Write 21.2
Mixed 12.8
14% 18.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.09
4K Write 0.29
4K Mixed 0.15
26% 0.17 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.3%
Great: 23%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
22.3% Poor
MC Read 7.8
MC Write 5.9
MC Mixed 5.7
18% 6.47 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 5.9
SC Mixed 6.8
19% 6.8 GB/s
Latency 67.1
60% 67.1 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 22.3%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P5N-E SLI Builds (Compare 84 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5N-E SLI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 31% - Below average Total price: $154
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback