Today's hottest deals

QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics68.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory7.91GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 7.91GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemQEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory4.2 GB free of 7.90625 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230606
Uptime1 Days
Run DateJul 25 '24 at 22:37
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: QEMU Virtual version 2.5+
CPU 0, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
76.1% Very good
Memory 61.7
1-Core 129
2-Core 255
79% 149 Pts
4-Core 484
8-Core 875
82% 679 Pts
64-Core 1,411
87% 1,411 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 76.1%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Legend(17AA C97A) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.3770
Performing below potential (54th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
68.1% Good
Lighting 92.6
Reflection 74.3
Parallax 87.9
76% 84.9 fps
MRender 83.2
Gravity 66.7
Splatting 53.5
54% 67.8 fps
Poor: 64%
This bench: 68.1%
Great: 70%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 275GB
136GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.5+
SusWrite @10s intervals: 881 897 893 915 917 909 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 8% Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 1x7GB
1 of 1 slots used
7GB DIMM RAM
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
68.1% Good
MC Read 26.4
MC Write 23.8
MC Mixed 25.8
72% 25.3 GB/s
SC Read 15.7
SC Write 16.4
SC Mixed 21.4
51% 17.8 GB/s
Latency 118
34% 118 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 68.1%
Great: 121%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 54 60 21.7" 1280 720 PSCCDD0 ParsecVDA
Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 620 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $499
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback