Today's hottest deals

Intel NUC8BEB

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics6.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive76.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 months ago, 2 months ago.
SystemIntel(R) NUC8i3BEH
MotherboardIntel NUC8BEB  (all builds)
Memory9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201007
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 20 '24 at 12:17
Run Duration189 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU 30%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-8109U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
63.6% Good
Memory 79.4
1-Core 99
2-Core 184
70% 121 Pts
4-Core 277
8-Core 280
37% 278 Pts
64-Core 281
17% 281 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 63.6%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
Intel(8086 2074) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
6.1% Terrible
Lighting 11.2
Reflection 9.8
Parallax 13.1
9% 11.4 fps
MRender 0.3
Gravity 0.3
Splatting 0.2
0% 0.27 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.1%
Great: 10%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 250GB
155GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT24B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 300 307 309 309 309 310 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
76.7% Very good
Read 463
Write 155
Mixed 266
SusWrite 307
66% 298 MB/s
4K Read 15.2
4K Write 65.6
4K Mixed 21.7
86% 34.2 MB/s
DQ Read 289
DQ Write 309
DQ Mixed 216
186% 271 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 76.7%
Great: 126%
Samsung 870 EVO 500GB-$53
459GB free
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 442 450 446 442 435 338 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
95.7% Outstanding
Read 462
Write 426
Mixed 401
SusWrite 426
97% 429 MB/s
4K Read 23.4
4K Write 67.8
4K Mixed 34.1
115% 41.8 MB/s
DQ Read 364
DQ Write 331
DQ Mixed 344
259% 346 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 95.7%
Great: 130%
ST350041 8AS 500GB
331GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.5 0.2 0.2 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
23.6% Poor
Read 119
Write 127
Mixed 70.5
SusWrite 0.3
99% 79.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
105% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 23.6%
Great: 51%
ST350063 0AS 500GB
466GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 23 23 23 23 23 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
21.4% Poor
Read 69.1
Write 73.9
Mixed 48.2
SusWrite 21.9
69% 53.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
94% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 21.4%
Great: 33%
Hitachi HTS543225L9A300 250GB
233GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 23 23 23 23 23 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
18% Very poor
Read 61.9
Write 61.4
Mixed 32.2
SusWrite 24
58% 44.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
66% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 18%
Great: 18%
FUJITSU MHY2200BH 200GB
186GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 46 46 47 47 46 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
20.9% Poor
Read 50.7
Write 44.9
Mixed 30
SusWrite 46
57% 42.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.5
57% 0.73 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance SODIM DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
97% Outstanding
MC Read 30.1
MC Write 44.9
MC Mixed 35.4
105% 36.8 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 34.3
SC Mixed 18.2
65% 22.6 GB/s
Latency 91.1
44% 91.1 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 97%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 47 16 60 27" 1920 1017 IVM6611 PLX2783H
Typical NUC8BEB Builds (Compare 1,764 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel NUC8BEB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $79
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $230Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback