Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING B650M-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 126%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 112%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 146%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 115%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics110% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive290% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B650M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory57.6 GB free of 64 GB
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240412
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 08 '24 at 12:19
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7900-$322
AM5, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 5.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Memory 76.3
1-Core 204
2-Core 397
117% 226 Pts
4-Core 817
8-Core 1,579
142% 1198 Pts
64-Core 2,562
159% 2,562 Pts
Poor: 98%
This bench: 115%
Great: 120%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6600-XT-$270
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.40.02
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Lighting 117
Reflection 141
Parallax 246
96% 168 fps
MRender 224
Gravity 119
Splatting 191
146% 178 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 110%
Great: 110%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$105
423GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1052 987 992 988 980 982 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
290% Outstanding
Read 2,539
Write 2,312
Mixed 1,695
SusWrite 997
422% 1886 MB/s
4K Read 40.7
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 55.9
197% 72.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,751
DQ Write 1,253
DQ Mixed 1,073
918% 1,359 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 290%
Great: 372%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
PUSKILL PSK-D5D46M5600B-32G 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM 22h 5600 MHz clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
66.5% Good
MC Read 24
MC Write 21.6
MC Mixed 23.4
66% 23 GB/s
SC Read 24.4
SC Write 22.8
SC Mixed 23.5
67% 23.6 GB/s
Latency 88.2
45% 88.2 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 66.5%
Great: 189%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 34" 1280 720 HPN374B HP M34d WQHD
Typical TUF GAMING B650M-PLUS Builds (Compare 75 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 51%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B650M-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 113% - Outstanding Total price: $610
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback