Today's hottest deals

Intel X79 (INTEL Xeon E5/Corei7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics84.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive32.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemINTEL
MotherboardIntel X79 (INTEL Xeon E5/Corei7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset  (all builds)
Memory23.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20231123
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 06 '24 at 20:58
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 21%
Watch Gameplay: 5700 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2689 0
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
70% Very good
Memory 77.7
1-Core 67.8
2-Core 136
57% 93.7 Pts
4-Core 335
8-Core 635
58% 485 Pts
64-Core 856
53% 856 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 70%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5700-$275
XFX(1682 0B36) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 24.4.1
Performing below potential (63rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
84.7% Excellent
Lighting 104
Reflection 183
Parallax 169
85% 152 fps
MRender 109
Gravity 118
Splatting 89.6
85% 106 fps
Poor: 78%
This bench: 84.7%
Great: 91%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
P4-240 240GB
97GB free (System drive)
Firmware: H181124
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 23 24 24 25 24 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
32.5% Below average
Read 370
Write 24.1
Mixed 35.4
SusWrite 24
24% 113 MB/s
4K Read 24.1
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 11.9
54% 13.7 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 32.5%
Great: 99%
Samsung HD502HJ 500GB-$50
466GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 140 139 140 140 141 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
87.2% Excellent
Read 164
Write 36.6
Mixed 77
SusWrite 140
77% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.2
216% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 87.2%
Great: 77%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 36KSF2G72PZ-1 Samsung M393B2G70QH0- 32GB
1600, 1600 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
28.5% Poor
MC Read 9.8
MC Write 8.8
MC Mixed 8.8
26% 9.13 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 10.3
SC Mixed 7.9
26% 9 GB/s
Latency 82.7
48% 82.7 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 55 60 23" 1280 720 AOC2351 2351
Typical X79 (INTEL Xeon E5/Corei7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset Builds (Compare 546 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel X79 (INTEL Xeon E5/Corei7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 38% - Below average Total price: $104
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback