Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-A520M K V2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 130%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 119%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics149% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive203% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A520M K V2  (all builds)
Memory8.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230920
Uptime1 Days
Run DateApr 30 '24 at 19:54
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5500-$87
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
88.7% Excellent
Memory 71
1-Core 154
2-Core 294
92% 173 Pts
4-Core 570
8-Core 868
89% 719 Pts
64-Core 979
61% 979 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 88.7%
Great: 101%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti-$375
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 552.22
Performing below potential (63rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
149% Outstanding
Lighting 204
Reflection 189
Parallax 207
166% 200 fps
MRender 296
Gravity 164
Splatting 123
150% 194 fps
Poor: 126%
This bench: 149%
Great: 157%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata LEGEND 850 Lite 1TB
154GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V0922A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 475 412 508 515 458 426 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
203% Outstanding
Read 1,959
Write 409
Mixed 508
SusWrite 466
182% 835 MB/s
4K Read 43.8
4K Write 80.2
4K Mixed 52.3
176% 58.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,138
DQ Write 722
DQ Mixed 1,010
731% 956 MB/s
Poor: 179%
This bench: 203%
Great: 482%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AX4U32008G16A-ST41 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
60.1% Good
MC Read 21.1
MC Write 17.6
MC Mixed 23
59% 20.6 GB/s
SC Read 21.2
SC Write 23
SC Mixed 22.5
64% 22.2 GB/s
Latency 94.7
42% 94.7 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 6: 0P 1R 0G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
6% 12% 17 196 20 144 23.8" 1280 720 AOC2402 24G2W1G4
Typical GA-A520M K V2 Builds (Compare 427 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A520M K V2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 118% - Outstanding Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback