Today's hottest deals

Asus ProArt X670E-CREATOR WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 353%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 121%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 447%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 123%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics299% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive339% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus ProArt X670E-CREATOR WIFI  (all builds)
Memory54.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230427
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateApr 19 '24 at 02:25
Run Duration211 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D-$598
AM5, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 5.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
123% Outstanding
Memory 88.7
1-Core 216
2-Core 409
125% 238 Pts
4-Core 840
8-Core 1,607
145% 1,223 Pts
64-Core 3650
226% 3650 Pts
Poor: 112%
This bench: 123%
Great: 124%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4080-S (Super)-$1,000
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5750 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 552.22
Performing below potential (53rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
299% Outstanding
Lighting 459
Reflection 637
Parallax 471
374% 522 fps
MRender 506
Gravity 387
Splatting 255
299% 383 fps
Poor: 283%
This bench: 299%
Great: 314%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$60
375GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2119 828 834 830 827 831 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
339% Outstanding
Read 2,648
Write 2,465
Mixed 1,908
SusWrite 1,045
451% 2,017 MB/s
4K Read 69.3
4K Write 190
4K Mixed 95.2
328% 118 MB/s
DQ Read 1,791
DQ Write 1,250
DQ Mixed 1,466
1,109% 1,502 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 339%
Great: 346%
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$75
818GB free
Firmware: 1B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1733 2087 2082 2083 2085 2086 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
337% Outstanding
Read 1,737
Write 2,058
Mixed 1,834
SusWrite 2,026
433% 1,914 MB/s
4K Read 53.9
4K Write 133
4K Mixed 72.7
245% 86.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,787
DQ Write 1,253
DQ Mixed 1,470
1,111% 1,503 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 337%
Great: 365%
T-force T253TY004T 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: VE1R9004
SusWrite @10s intervals: 380 412 412 411 412 411 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMH64GX5M2B6000C30 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 6000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
260% Outstanding
MC Read 153
MC Write 66
MC Mixed 82.1
287% 100 GB/s
SC Read 51.8
SC Write 76.9
SC Mixed 61
181% 63.2 GB/s
Latency 68.9
58% 68.9 ns
Poor: 141%
This bench: 260%
Great: 260%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 165 31.5" 1280 720 AOCB305 Q32G3WG3R3
Typical ProArt X670E-CREATOR WIFI Builds (Compare 72 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 404%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 115%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 531%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ProArt X670E-CREATOR WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $2,667
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback