Today's hottest deals

HP Z820 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics16.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive166% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Z820 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 158B
Memory120.2 GB free of 128 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191028
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 28 '24 at 05:27
Run Duration175 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2
CPU0, 2 CPU, 24 cores, 48 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
68.1% Good
Memory 78.7
1-Core 83.3
2-Core 165
64% 109 Pts
4-Core 310
8-Core 628
55% 469 Pts
64-Core 2,418
150% 2,418 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 68.1%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K2200-$440
HP(103C 1097) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1124 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
16.2% Very poor
Lighting 20
Reflection 17
Parallax 19.2
16% 18.7 fps
MRender 22.6
Gravity 21.6
Splatting 15.7
16% 20 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 16.2%
Great: 17%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDPEDMD800G4 800GB
410GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 8DV10171
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1500 1504 1512 1406 1328 1345 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
166% Outstanding
Read 739
Write 1,524
Mixed 653
SusWrite 1,432
248% 1,087 MB/s
4K Read 27.5
4K Write 60.6
4K Mixed 33.1
116% 40.4 MB/s
DQ Read 373
DQ Write 235
DQ Mixed 282
216% 297 MB/s
Poor: 177%
This bench: 166%
Great: 301%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$80
931GB free
Firmware: 043
SusWrite @10s intervals: 403 402 406 404 327 250 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
89% Excellent
Read 409
Write 397
Mixed 377
SusWrite 365
87% 387 MB/s
4K Read 32.3
4K Write 51.2
4K Mixed 38.9
126% 40.8 MB/s
DQ Read 272
DQ Write 217
DQ Mixed 157
141% 216 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 89%
Great: 125%
Seagate ST4000NC000-1FR168 4TB
3TB free
Firmware: CE02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 151 153 149 152 152 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
89.9% Excellent
Read 162
Write 122
Mixed 85.4
SusWrite 152
96% 130 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
142% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 89.9%
Great: 99%
Toshiba MG04SCA40EN 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: DS07
SusWrite @10s intervals: 203 205 205 204 206 203 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 199
Write 195
Mixed 74.8
SusWrite 204
122% 168 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1
206% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 88%
This bench: 116%
Great: 116%
Toshiba MG04SCA40EN 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: DS07
SusWrite @10s intervals: 209 210 210 209 210 209 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 176
Write 189
Mixed 72.6
SusWrite 209
118% 162 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 3.7
4K Mixed 1
226% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 88%
This bench: 111%
Great: 116%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 36JSF2G72PZ-1G9E1 36JSF2G72PZ-1G9E1 Samsung M393B2G70DB0-CMA Samsung M393B2G70DB0-CMA 36JSF2G72PZ-1G9E1 36JSF2G72PZ-1G9E1 Samsung M393B2G70DB0-CMA Samsung M393B2G70DB0-CMA 128GB
1866, 1866, 1866, 1866, 1866, 1866, 1866, 1866 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
58.4% Above average
MC Read 26.5
MC Write 20.8
MC Mixed 20.5
65% 22.6 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 4.5
SC Mixed 5.9
23% 8.1 GB/s
Latency 81.7
49% 81.7 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 31.5" 1280 720 ACR0687 Acer ET322QU
Typical Z820 Workstation Builds (Compare 1,813 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: HP Z820 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $70
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback