Today's hottest deals

MSI MEG X670E ACE (MS-7D69)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 340%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 117%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 442%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 118%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics300% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive344% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7D69
MotherboardMSI MEG X670E ACE (MS-7D69)  (all builds)
Memory55.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240215
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 27 '24 at 19:45
Run Duration192 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D-$605
AM5, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 5.05 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
118% Outstanding
Memory 80.9
1-Core 213
2-Core 414
122% 236 Pts
4-Core 828
8-Core 1,617
145% 1,223 Pts
64-Core 3,663
227% 3,663 Pts
Poor: 112%
This bench: 118%
Great: 124%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4080-S (Super)-$1,000
CLim: 3135 MHz, MLim: 5850 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 551.86
Performing below potential (53rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
300% Outstanding
Lighting 452
Reflection 465
Parallax 546
368% 487 fps
MRender 526
Gravity 412
Splatting 264
313% 401 fps
Poor: 283%
This bench: 300%
Great: 314%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 990 Pro M.2 1TB-$100
581GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B2QJXD7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3508 2881 1710 1235 1434 1581 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
344% Outstanding
Read 2,559
Write 3,657
Mixed 3,044
SusWrite 2058
640% 2,830 MB/s
4K Read 56.9
4K Write 80.2
4K Mixed 67.4
215% 68.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,425
DQ Write 781
DQ Mixed 1243
887% 1,150 MB/s
Poor: 275%
This bench: 344%
Great: 507%
SHPP41-2000GM 2TB
683GB free
Firmware: 51060A20
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1514 3283 3265 3268 3259 3255 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
483% Outstanding
Read 4,317
Write 3,258
Mixed 2,776
SusWrite 2974
746% 3,331 MB/s
4K Read 56.6
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 75
240% 80.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,636
DQ Write 800
DQ Mixed 1,384
983% 1,273 MB/s
Poor: 301%
This bench: 483%
Great: 641%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F5-6000J3040G32G 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 6000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
285% Outstanding
MC Read 193
MC Write 66.8
MC Mixed 76.1
320% 112 GB/s
SC Read 47.7
SC Write 75.1
SC Mixed 56
170% 59.6 GB/s
Latency 76.5
52% 76.5 ns
Poor: 152%
This bench: 285%
Great: 285%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 165 34.1" 1280 720 SAM711A LC34G55T
Typical MEG X670E ACE (MS-7D69) Builds (Compare 32 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 404%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 115%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 531%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MEG X670E ACE (MS-7D69)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $2,476
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $233Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback