Today's hottest deals

Dell Vostro 270

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics85.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive90.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDell Vostro 270  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 084J0R
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180522
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateMar 20 '24 at 14:09
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 23%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
74.2% Very good
Memory 83.3
1-Core 97.5
2-Core 189
71% 123 Pts
4-Core 354
8-Core 497
54% 425 Pts
64-Core 490
30% 490 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 74.2%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$140
Asus(1043 86F0) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
85.2% Excellent
Lighting 106
Reflection 102
Parallax 103
87% 104 fps
MRender 128
Gravity 94
Splatting 87.4
82% 103 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 85.2%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
MK000960GWSSD 960GB
725GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPG1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 245 367 420 427 432 433 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
90.3% Outstanding
Read 447
Write 431
Mixed 409
SusWrite 387
94% 419 MB/s
4K Read 24
4K Write 49.7
4K Mixed 33
105% 35.6 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 329
DQ Mixed 354
266% 356 MB/s
Poor: 90%
This bench: 90.3%
Great: 119%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
465GB free
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 210 230 234 237 236 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
62.5% Good
Read 244
Write 234
Mixed 228
SusWrite 215
52% 230 MB/s
4K Read 21.7
4K Write 56.7
4K Mixed 28.4
99% 35.6 MB/s
DQ Read 205
DQ Write 193
DQ Mixed 198
149% 199 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 62.5%
Great: 129%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B1G73DB0-CK0 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
55.6% Above average
MC Read 20.9
MC Write 19.5
MC Mixed 17.2
55% 19.2 GB/s
SC Read 17.4
SC Write 17.8
SC Mixed 18.2
51% 17.8 GB/s
Latency 77.3
52% 77.3 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 22 2 144 23.5" 1280 720 AOC2401 24G1WG4
Typical Vostro 270 Builds (Compare 445 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Vostro 270

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $84
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback