Today's hottest deals

Asus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop X7600PC_N7600PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (7th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 93 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive137% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop X7600PC_N7600PC  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X7600PC
Memory9.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211108
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 20 '24 at 14:26
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 51%

 PC Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-11300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
50% Above average
Memory 46.2
1-Core 86.3
2-Core 148
52% 93.5 Pts
4-Core 289
8-Core 460
46% 374 Pts
64-Core 459
28% 459 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 50%
Great: 77%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme HFM512GD3JX013N 512GB
46GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 41000C20 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 359 250 150 149 142 162 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
137% Outstanding
Read 1,384
Write 330
Mixed 584
SusWrite 202
136% 625 MB/s
4K Read 34.1
4K Write 93.9
4K Mixed 41.9
155% 56.6 MB/s
DQ Read 706
DQ Write 266
DQ Mixed 426
331% 466 MB/s
Poor: 137%
This bench: 137%
Great: 313%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G44AB0-CWE 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
55.3% Above average
MC Read 20.5
MC Write 25.5
MC Mixed 16.9
60% 21 GB/s
SC Read 8.4
SC Write 19.7
SC Mixed 10.8
37% 13 GB/s
Latency 161
25% 161 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 55.3%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 30 24 64 0" 1280 720
Typical Vivobook_ASUSLaptop X7600PC_N7600PC Builds (Compare 485 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: Asus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop X7600PC_N7600PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback