Today's hottest deals

HP Z640 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics22.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive59.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Z640 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 212A
Memory10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220331
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 12 '24 at 22:23
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User EGY-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v3
CPU0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
73.9% Very good
Memory 80.6
1-Core 98.9
2-Core 192
71% 124 Pts
4-Core 362
8-Core 602
59% 482 Pts
64-Core 716
44% 716 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 560-$500
Gigabyte(1458 22ED) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1287 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 23.11.1
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
22.8% Poor
Lighting 28
Reflection 27.6
Parallax 39
23% 31.5 fps
MRender 26.8
Gravity 31.6
Splatting 25.7
23% 28 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 22.8%
Great: 25%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Team T253512GB 512GB
266GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN11573
SusWrite @10s intervals: 318 306 307 315 318 313 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
59.2% Above average
Read 291
Write 314
Mixed 294
SusWrite 313
68% 303 MB/s
4K Read 22.7
4K Write 39.3
4K Mixed 24.3
86% 28.8 MB/s
DQ Read 22.7
DQ Write 56.5
DQ Mixed 25.8
24% 35 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 59.2%
Great: 102%
JAJS600M1920GB 2TB
290GB free
Firmware: U0128A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 361 353 348 354 356 364 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
69.9% Good
Read 424
Write 296
Mixed 31.9
SusWrite 356
62% 277 MB/s
4K Read 26.1
4K Write 58.7
4K Mixed 19.8
96% 34.9 MB/s
DQ Read 24.5
DQ Write 95.3
DQ Mixed 23.3
28% 47.7 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 69.9%
Great: 102%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$106
507GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 82 81 81 81 82 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
46.8% Average
Read 82.2
Write 79.2
Mixed 63.1
SusWrite 80.6
56% 76.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.7
143% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9965589-007.D01G 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
63.3% Good
MC Read 27.6
MC Write 20.1
MC Mixed 20.2
65% 22.6 GB/s
SC Read 13.5
SC Write 19.3
SC Mixed 18.8
49% 17.2 GB/s
Latency 73
55% 73 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 63.3%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 55 0 84.6" 1280 720 SAM71B5 SAMSUNG
Typical Z640 Workstation Builds (Compare 1,650 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: HP Z640 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 16% - Very poor Total price: $509
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback