Today's hottest deals

Acer Veriton X4665G

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics6.25% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAcer Veriton X4665G  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Veriton X4665G
Memory12.8 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20191205
Uptime22.7 Days
Run DateJan 05 '24 at 05:22
Run Duration108 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700-$190
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
88.2% Excellent
Memory 82.2
1-Core 121
2-Core 262
85% 155 Pts
4-Core 504
8-Core 941
86% 723 Pts
64-Core 953
59% 953 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 88.2%
Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Acer(1025 138D) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7871
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
6.25% Terrible
Lighting 7
Reflection 8.5
Parallax 6.8
6% 7.43 fps
MRender 8
Gravity 7
Splatting 10.9
7% 8.63 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.25%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$35
201GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 82 98 97 106 98 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
59.5% Above average
Read 112
Write 123
Mixed 69.9
SusWrite 95.5
74% 100 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
119% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43DB2-CTD 3x8GB
3 of 4 slots used
24GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
50.5% Above average
MC Read 17.9
MC Write 18.8
MC Mixed 16
50% 17.6 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 16.5
SC Mixed 16
42% 14.9 GB/s
Latency 78
51% 78 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 61 47 120 27" 1920 1009 ONN0000 100094417
Typical Veriton X4665G Builds (Compare 17 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Veriton X4665G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 106% - Outstanding Total price: $134
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $288WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback