Today's hottest deals

MSI MAG X670E TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7E12)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 359%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 113%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 508%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics418% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive727% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7E12
MotherboardMSI MAG X670E TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7E12)  (all builds)
Memory58.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240103
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 05 '24 at 03:23
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D-$579
AM5, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 5.15 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
89.8% Excellent
Memory 84.6
1-Core 219
2-Core 435
127% 246 Pts
4-Core 509
8-Core 986
89% 748 Pts
64-Core 3681
228% 3681 Pts
Poor: 112%
This bench: 89.8%
Great: 124%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4090-$1,802
CLim: 3165 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 546.33
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
418% Outstanding
Lighting 673
Reflection 620
Parallax 774
549% 689 fps
MRender 570
Gravity 611
Splatting 326
393% 502 fps
Poor: 290%
This bench: 418%
Great: 402%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial T700 M.2 4TB-$400
3.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: PACR5102 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5657 5495 5469 5393 5385 5458 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
727% Outstanding
Read 6,358
Write 5,571
Mixed 3,263
SusWrite 5,476
1,159% 5,167 MB/s
4K Read 63.7
4K Write 127
4K Mixed 82.4
269% 91 MB/s
DQ Read 1,672
DQ Write 774
DQ Mixed 1,451
1,016% 1,299 MB/s
Poor: 415%
This bench: 727%
Great: 994%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown UD5-6000 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 6000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
262% Outstanding
MC Read 149
MC Write 64.9
MC Mixed 90.4
290% 102 GB/s
SC Read 50.9
SC Write 75.4
SC Mixed 59.6
177% 62 GB/s
Latency 73.4
54% 73.4 ns
Poor: 121%
This bench: 262%
Great: 262%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 72 60 60 31.5" 1280 720 KTC3202 Q3202S
Typical MAG X670E TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7E12) Builds (Compare 305 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 413%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 419%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MAG X670E TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7E12)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $2,441
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback