Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS WIFI

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 104%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics119% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS WIFI  (all builds)
Memory53.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farger
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230426
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateDec 27 '23 at 19:43
Run Duration80 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 7600X-$199
AM5, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 5.15 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
104% Outstanding
Memory 76.8
1-Core 201
2-Core 399
116% 225 Pts
4-Core 705
8-Core 1,187
115% 946 Pts
64-Core 1,398
87% 1,398 Pts
Poor: 101%
This bench: 104%
Great: 120%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$275
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.33
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
119% Outstanding
Lighting 156
Reflection 220
Parallax 155
127% 177 fps
MRender 186
Gravity 132
Splatting 120
116% 146 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 119%
Great: 123%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SNV2S1000G 1TB
132GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBM02103
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,092
Write 2,286
Mixed 1,593
444% 1,990 MB/s
4K Read 49.9
4K Write 242
4K Mixed 47.5
264% 113 MB/s
DQ Read 772
DQ Write 1,448
DQ Mixed 612
606% 944 MB/s
Poor: 150% Great: 352%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F5-6000J3038F16G 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
123% Outstanding
MC Read 43.7
MC Write 44.1
MC Mixed 42.2
124% 43.3 GB/s
SC Read 46.1
SC Write 45.6
SC Mixed 45.5
131% 45.7 GB/s
Latency 90
44% 90 ns
Poor: 123%
This bench: 123%
Great: 268%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 5 214 60 240 24.5" 1280 720 BNQ7F58 ZOWIE XL LCD
Typical TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS WIFI Builds (Compare 463 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 413%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 419%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $2,518
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback