| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 24.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 37.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
| Motherboard | Asus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA (all builds) |
| Memory | 12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20160113 |
| Uptime | 2.3 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 07 '18 at 02:32 |
| Run Duration | 134 Seconds |
| Run User | DEU-User |
| Background CPU | 8% |
PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
66.4%
Good
|
60% 98.8 Pts
|
42% 343 Pts
|
26% 412 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD RX 470-$126
CLim: 1169 MHz, MLim: 1650 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 17.12.2
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
24.3%
Poor
|
24% 33.3 fps
|
24% 29.7 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
37.9%
Below average
|
38% 177 MB/s
|
52% 14.8 MB/s
|
25% 58 MB/s
|
|
|
74.6%
Very good
|
84% 113 MB/s
|
80% 0.81 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston KHX1866C9D3/4GX KHX1866C9D3/4GX KHX1600C9D3/4GX KHX1600C9D3/4GX 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
44%
Average
|
45% 15.7 GB/s
|
26% 9.27 GB/s
|
55% 72.7 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical 970 PRO GAMING/AURA Builds (Compare 919 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA - $299
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| FX-8350AMD $85Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 440x |
| FX-6300AMD $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 114x |
| FX-8370AMD $175Bench 62%, 34,720 samples | 86x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 89x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 66x |
| RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 53x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 63% - Good | Total price: $543 |