Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-Z590 VISION D

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 107%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Boot Drive538% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
10 months ago, 10 months ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z590 VISION D  (all builds)
Memory17.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210618
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 15 '23 at 15:06
Run Duration258 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-11900-$270
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
107% Outstanding
Memory 91.7
1-Core 165
2-Core 329
105% 195 Pts
4-Core 652
8-Core 1,180
110% 916 Pts
64-Core 1,670
103% 1,670 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 107%
Great: 108%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 900P Optane NVMe PCIe 280GB-$300
126GB free (System drive)
Firmware: E2010603 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1743 1706 1739 1764 1694 1761 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
538% Outstanding
Read 2,303
Write 1,963
Mixed 2,139
SusWrite 1,734
458% 2,035 MB/s
4K Read 280
4K Write 250
4K Mixed 260
891% 263 MB/s
DQ Read 1,584
DQ Write 1,271
DQ Mixed 1,384
1,048% 1,413 MB/s
Poor: 302%
This bench: 538%
Great: 559%
Intel SSDPED1D480GAH 480GB
241GB free
Firmware: E201HPS2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1993 1991 1991 1993 1984 1966 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
566% Outstanding
Read 2,343
Write 2,109
Mixed 2,222
SusWrite 1,986
488% 2,165 MB/s
4K Read 286
4K Write 260
4K Mixed 268
915% 272 MB/s
DQ Read 1,668
DQ Write 1,368
DQ Mixed 1,475
1,116% 1504 MB/s
Poor: 315%
This bench: 566%
Great: 566%
Seagate ST12000NE0008-2JL101 12TB
81GB free
Firmware: EN01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 105 105 105 106 106 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 28% Great: 107%
Seagate Barracuda 6TB (2017)-$115
50GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 91 88 94 98 78 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
44.6% Average
Read 66
Write 105
Mixed 69.3
SusWrite 87.9
61% 82 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 0.5
209% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 44.6%
Great: 87%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$111
141GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 117 122 104 102 98 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
46.2% Average
Read 49.2
Write 102
Mixed 67.8
SusWrite 110
61% 82.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 0.5
210% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 46.2%
Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$111
43GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 95 94 96 98 96 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
45.8% Average
Read 62.7
Write 86.4
Mixed 64.6
SusWrite 95.3
57% 77.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 5.4
4K Mixed 0.5
193% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 90%
WD Elements SE 25FF 4TB
412GB free, PID 25ff
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 54 54 53 54 53 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
40.9% Average
Read 49.9
Write 60.3
Mixed 50
SusWrite 53.8
74% 53.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 7.1
4K Mixed 0.8
271% 2.87 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 40.9%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMT32GX4M2C3200C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3206 MHz
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
99.6% Outstanding
MC Read 40.6
MC Write 35.6
MC Mixed 29.5
101% 35.2 GB/s
SC Read 25.9
SC Write 40.1
SC Mixed 31.6
93% 32.5 GB/s
Latency 64.1
62% 64.1 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 99.6%
Great: 122%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 23 3 32 0" 1280 720
Typical GA-Z590 VISION D Builds (Compare 959 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 206%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 107%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 208%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z590 VISION D

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $1,020
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback