Today's hottest deals

Asus PRIME X670E-PRO WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 313%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 117%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 373%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 117%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics278% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive303% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
10 months ago, 10 months ago.
MotherboardAsus PRIME X670E-PRO WIFI  (all builds)
Memory52.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230825
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 10 '23 at 02:22
Run Duration371 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X-$320
AM5, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 5.25 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
117% Outstanding
Memory 75.8
1-Core 215
2-Core 428
123% 240 Pts
4-Core 842
8-Core 1,621
146% 1,232 Pts
64-Core 2,813
174% 2,813 Pts
Poor: 96%
This bench: 117%
Great: 124%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 7900-XTX-$1,000
XFX(1EAE 7901) ≥ 4GB; XFX SPEEDSTER MERC310 Radeon RX 7900 XTX 24GB
Ram: 24GB, Driver: 23.12.1
Performing below potential (77th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
278% Outstanding
Lighting 372
Reflection 506
Parallax 843
304% 574 fps
MRender 546
Gravity 295
Splatting 464
356% 435 fps
Poor: 221%
This bench: 278%
Great: 294%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 990 Pro M.2 1TB-$100
759GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QJXD7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1280 1244 1304 1337 1343 1334 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
303% Outstanding
Read 1,423
Write 1,353
Mixed 1,301
SusWrite 1,307
303% 1346 MB/s
4K Read 70.6
4K Write 165
4K Mixed 99.5
322% 112 MB/s
DQ Read 1,530
DQ Write 1,432
DQ Mixed 1,671
1,202% 1,545 MB/s
Poor: 275%
This bench: 303%
Great: 507%
Crucial T700 M.2 2TB-$290
411GB free
Firmware: PACR5101
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 7,554
Write 8,148
Mixed 3,817
1,447% 6,506 MB/s
4K Read 79.9
4K Write 279
4K Mixed 126
430% 161 MB/s
DQ Read 1,859
DQ Write 1,454
DQ Mixed 1,671
1,246% 1,661 MB/s
Poor: 475% Great: 926%
CT4000P3PSSD8 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: P9CR40A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3921 4128 4133 4143 4140 4043 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
510% Outstanding
Read 2,043
Write 3,886
Mixed 2,490
SusWrite 4,085
712% 3,126 MB/s
4K Read 58.6
4K Write 265
4K Mixed 93.7
349% 139 MB/s
DQ Read 1,796
DQ Write 1,425
DQ Mixed 1,619
1,209% 1,613 MB/s
Poor: 137%
This bench: 510%
Great: 530%
Corsair MP400 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: ECFM53.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2784 2820 2827 2832 2825 2835 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
393% Outstanding
Read 1,421
Write 2674
Mixed 1,536
SusWrite 2,821
481% 2,113 MB/s
4K Read 46.4
4K Write 246
4K Mixed 82.9
306% 125 MB/s
DQ Read 1,307
DQ Write 1,833
DQ Mixed 1,508
1,157% 1,549 MB/s
Poor: 129%
This bench: 393%
Great: 370%
Sabrent Rocket 4 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$100
931GB free
Firmware: RKT401.1 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3914 3993 3995 3987 3982 4001 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
513% Outstanding
Read 2,096
Write 3,714
Mixed 2,245
SusWrite 3,979
685% 3,009 MB/s
4K Read 50.8
4K Write 277
4K Mixed 93.1
343% 140 MB/s
DQ Read 2,029
DQ Write 1,625
DQ Mixed 1,802
1,355% 1,818 MB/s
Poor: 189%
This bench: 513%
Great: 486%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF560C36-16 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
127% Outstanding
MC Read 49
MC Write 42
MC Mixed 44.3
129% 45.1 GB/s
SC Read 49.7
SC Write 45.5
SC Mixed 43.5
132% 46.2 GB/s
Latency 90.4
44% 90.4 ns
Poor: 127%
This bench: 127%
Great: 212%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 60 27" 1280 720 MSI4CC3 MSI G271CQP
Typical PRIME X670E-PRO WIFI Builds (Compare 149 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 413%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 419%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X670E-PRO WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $2,485
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $143
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $315Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback