Today's hottest deals

Default string

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 72%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 69%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics74.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive281% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardDefault Default String
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230508
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateDec 02 '23 at 21:46
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12400F-$112
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
93.1% Outstanding
Memory 91
1-Core 168
2-Core 330
106% 197 Pts
4-Core 510
8-Core 953
87% 731 Pts
64-Core 1,158
72% 1,158 Pts
Poor: 92%
This bench: 93.1%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3050-$243
MSI(1462 8E99) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.17
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
74.8% Very good
Lighting 102
Reflection 116
Parallax 88.9
83% 102 fps
MRender 85.1
Gravity 70.2
Splatting 63.9
59% 73.1 fps
Poor: 68%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 78%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata LEGEND 710 512GB
398GB free (System drive)
Firmware: VC0S036H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1201 1197 1197 1206 1208 1207 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
281% Outstanding
Read 2,178
Write 1,208
Mixed 1,332
SusWrite 1,203
330% 1,480 MB/s
4K Read 51.1
4K Write 168
4K Mixed 75.5
263% 98.4 MB/s
DQ Read 670
DQ Write 1,084
DQ Mixed 798
627% 851 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 281%
Great: 291%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Gold Key Co Ltd NMUD480E85-3000D 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
56.4% Above average
MC Read 19.6
MC Write 19.7
MC Mixed 17.5
54% 18.9 GB/s
SC Read 18.9
SC Write 20.6
SC Mixed 18.6
55% 19.4 GB/s
Latency 65.9
61% 65.9 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 56.4%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 67: 0P 5R 10G 12B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
67% 60% 45 317 60 240 27" 1280 720 SAM727D Odyssey G40B
Typical string Builds (Compare 15,311 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Excellent Total price: $84
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback