Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 83FQ

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics25.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive166% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 83FQ  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory9 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231013
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 30 '23 at 22:15
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
12th Gen Intel Core i5-12450HX
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
88.1% Excellent
Memory 68.6
1-Core 168
2-Core 329
98% 188 Pts
4-Core 577
8-Core 877
90% 727 Pts
64-Core 1,075
66% 1,075 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 88.1%
Great: 98%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Arc A530M Graphics
Legend(17AA 3D16) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.4972
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
25.9% Poor
Lighting 47.3
Reflection 74.9
Parallax 97.1
38% 73.1 fps
MRender 0.6
Gravity 0.8
Splatting 2.7
1% 1.37 fps
Poor: 26%
This bench: 25.9%
Great: 63%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Solidigm SSDPFINW512GZL 512GB
216GB free (System drive)
Firmware: C02C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 443 74 232 77 234 1280 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
166% Outstanding
Read 1,167
Write 1,112
Mixed 911
SusWrite 390
200% 895 MB/s
4K Read 42
4K Write 145
4K Mixed 59.5
217% 82.2 MB/s
DQ Read 443
DQ Write 869
DQ Mixed 548
447% 620 MB/s
Poor: 93%
This bench: 166%
Great: 258%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M425R1GB4BB0-CQKOL 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
119% Outstanding
MC Read 48
MC Write 45.5
MC Mixed 43.1
130% 45.5 GB/s
SC Read 19.3
SC Write 42.7
SC Mixed 26.4
84% 29.5 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 101%
This bench: 119%
Great: 136%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 144 15.5" 1280 720 AUO7EAD
Typical 83FQ Builds (Compare 40 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 83FQ

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback