Today's hottest deals

Asus X550JX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.23% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive61.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Run History
8 years ago, 8 years ago.
SystemAsus X550JX  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X550JX
Memory5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20150811
Uptime7.5 Days
Run DateJan 14 '16 at 11:37
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User TWN-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4200H
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
65% Good
Memory 86.2
1-Core 98.6
2-Core 176
71% 120 Pts
4-Core 255
8-Core 259
34% 257 Pts
64-Core 260
16% 260 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 65%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Asus(1043 178D) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.3496
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
4.23% Terrible
Lighting 4.8
Reflection 6.58
Parallax 6.03
4% 5.8 fps
MRender 7.19
Gravity 2.33
Splatting 7.65
5% 5.73 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.23%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend SSD370S 128GB-$66
45GB free (System drive)
Firmware: N1126KB Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
61.3% Good
Read 496
Write 157
Mixed 239
65% 297 MB/s
4K Read 22
4K Write 59.9
4K Mixed 14.3
83% 32.1 MB/s
DQ Read 238
DQ Write 99.4
DQ Mixed 56.9
72% 131 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 61.3%
Great: 90%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
929GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3J0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
69.9% Good
Read 116
Write 128
Mixed 112
89% 119 MB/s
4K Read 0.71
4K Write 1.45
4K Mixed 0.19
78% 0.78 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 69.9%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173EB0-YK0 Kingston 9905469-153.A00LF 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
55.2% Above average
MC Read 18.4
MC Write 21.8
MC Mixed 16.8
54% 19 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 17.7
49% 17.1 GB/s
Latency 71.1
56% 71.1 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X550JX Builds (Compare 1,156 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Asus X550JX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $230Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback