PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
Graphics | 28.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 25.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 17GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 17GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Fujitsu CELSIUS W530 (all builds) |
Motherboard | FUJITSU D3227-A1 |
Memory | 11.2 GB free of 17 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit couleurs |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20140205 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Jan 03 '18 at 13:17 |
Run Duration | 180 Seconds |
Run User | FRA-User |
Background CPU | 70% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E3-1225 v3-$170
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 0.85 GHz (avg)
|
33.4%
Below average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD R9 280X-$500
MSI(1462 2775) 3GB
CLim: 1020 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 16.6
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
28.9%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
39.2%
Below average
|
||||
25.5%
Poor
|
||||
58.7%
Above average
|
||||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-4790Intel $115Bench 71%, 255,027 samples | 90x |
Core i7-4770Intel $75Bench 70%, 176,321 samples | 32x |
Core i5-4590Intel $188Bench 63%, 151,366 samples | 31x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples | 60x |
Quadro K620Nvidia $170Bench 11%, 16,214 samples | 34x |
HD Graphics P4600IntelBench 3%, 2,141 samples | 26x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 74% - Very good | Total price: $177 |