Today's hottest deals

HP Z240 SFF Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics14.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive92.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
10 months ago, 10 months ago.
SystemHP Z240 SFF Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 802E
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200429
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 24 '23 at 02:27
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 36%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1225 v5
CPU0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
68.9% Good
Memory 83
1-Core 95.2
2-Core 182
70% 120 Pts
4-Core 313
8-Core 344
43% 328 Pts
64-Core 374
23% 374 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 68.9%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 550-$79
Device(1816 BD14) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1183 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 23.11.1
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
14.3% Very poor
Lighting 15
Reflection 26.9
Parallax 21.7
12% 21.2 fps
MRender 24.8
Gravity 16.8
Splatting 24.5
18% 22 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 14.3%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LN256HAJQ-000H1 256GB
188GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MVT03H3Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 337 302 300 307 309 307 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
92.1% Outstanding
Read 428
Write 363
Mixed 336
SusWrite 310
81% 359 MB/s
4K Read 31.3
4K Write 68.8
4K Mixed 38.5
133% 46.2 MB/s
DQ Read 354
DQ Write 309
DQ Mixed 325
246% 330 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 92.1%
Great: 119%
Hitachi HUS722T2TALA604 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: RRA4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 200 192 193 192 193 191 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 192
Write 193
Mixed 122
SusWrite 194
129% 175 MB/s
4K Read 4.3
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 1
353% 2.9 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 111%
Great: 111%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905702-119.A00G 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
66.7% Good
MC Read 24.1
MC Write 25.9
MC Mixed 20.7
67% 23.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.1
SC Write 25.8
SC Mixed 19.4
57% 20.1 GB/s
Latency 74
54% 74 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 66.7%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 30 84.6" 1280 720 SAM0F18 SAMSUNG
Typical Z240 SFF Workstation Builds (Compare 977 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: HP Z240 SFF Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $150
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback