Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING II

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 63%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics101% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive162% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory40GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 40GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING II  (all builds)
Memory19.8 GB free of 40 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20180831
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateNov 18 '23 at 14:18
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User KHM-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700K-$235
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
59.5% Above average
Memory 66.1
1-Core 108
2-Core 198
69% 124 Pts
4-Core 284
8-Core 542
49% 413 Pts
64-Core 547
34% 547 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$281
Asus(1043 8816) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 546.17
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
101% Outstanding
Lighting 132
Reflection 117
Parallax 122
108% 124 fps
MRender 142
Gravity 100
Splatting 86.6
87% 109 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 101%
Great: 106%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata LEGEND 850 512GB
239GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V1223B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1229 1409 741 501 302 330 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
162% Outstanding
Read 980
Write 1,145
Mixed 913
SusWrite 752
214% 947 MB/s
4K Read 24.9
4K Write 80.5
4K Mixed 35.6
126% 47 MB/s
DQ Read 1,060
DQ Write 664
DQ Mixed 859
641% 861 MB/s
Poor: 162%
This bench: 162%
Great: 381%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR4 3600 DDR4 3000 AX4U320016G16A-ST50 40GB
2733, 2733, 2733 MHz
8192, 16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
63.4% Good
MC Read 24.4
MC Write 25.1
MC Mixed 23.3
69% 24.3 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 16.4
SC Mixed 12.1
36% 12.5 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 64 49 60 21.7" 1280 720 GSM5AB8 LG IPS FULLHD
Typical TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING II Builds (Compare 674 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 94%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING II

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $515
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback