Today's hottest deals

HPE ProLiant MicroServer Gen10 Plus v2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (7th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 93 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 28%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive30.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (82%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHPE ProLiant MicroServer Gen10 Plus v2  (all builds)
MotherboardHPE ProLiant MicroServer Gen10 Plus v2
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colori, 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230720
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 15 '23 at 09:20
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 82%

 PC Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium Gold G6405
Proc 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
28% Poor
Memory 30.5
1-Core 49.1
2-Core 64.3
29% 48 Pts
4-Core 138
8-Core 194
21% 166 Pts
64-Core 247
15% 247 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 28%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HPE LOGICAL VOLUME 480GB
407GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 108 105 96 123 115 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
30.9% Below average
Read 133
Write 127
Mixed 102
SusWrite 107
26% 117 MB/s
4K Read 8.5
4K Write 17
4K Mixed 8.4
33% 11.3 MB/s
DQ Read 305
DQ Write 105
DQ Mixed 160
130% 190 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 30.9%
Great: 100%
HPE LOGICAL VOLUME 6TB
5.5TB free
Firmware: 5.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 31 31 28 35 33 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
47.3% Average
Read 134
Write 34.6
Mixed 44.8
SusWrite 30.9
45% 61 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
130% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 47.3%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMAA2GU7CJR8N-XN 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
30% Below average
MC Read 12.4
MC Write 11.6
MC Mixed 9.2
32% 11.1 GB/s
SC Read 2.3
SC Write 6.5
SC Mixed 4.2
12% 4.33 GB/s
Latency 99.1
40% 99.1 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 30%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 15 12 32 0" 1280 720
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback