Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 82TD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics1.88% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemLenovo 82TD  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory6.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230607
Uptime20.9 Days
Run DateNov 14 '23 at 01:07
Run Duration299 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12800HX
U3E1, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
89.5% Excellent
Memory 70.8
1-Core 192
2-Core 349
107% 204 Pts
4-Core 580
8-Core 876
90% 728 Pts
64-Core 1,386
86% 1,386 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 89.5%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Legend(17AA 3B17) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.3222
Relative performance (0th percentile)
1.88% Terrible
Lighting 2.2
Reflection 3.1
Parallax 2.5
2% 2.6 fps
MRender 2.8
Gravity 2.7
Splatting 2.2
2% 2.57 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 1.88%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL2512HCJQ-00BL2 512GB
124GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CL1QGXA7
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,401
Write 2,753
Mixed 2,345
560% 2,499 MB/s
4K Read 63.4
4K Write 123
4K Mixed 90.9
278% 92.4 MB/s
DQ Read 811
DQ Write 391
DQ Mixed 571
432% 591 MB/s
Poor: 176% Great: 404%
Kingston SKC3000S1024G 1TB
376GB free
Firmware: EIFK31.6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3784 2442 1863 1021 911 920 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
303% Outstanding
Read 2,384
Write 3,301
Mixed 2,465
SusWrite 1,824
564% 2,493 MB/s
4K Read 43.9
4K Write 119
4K Mixed 68.8
218% 77.1 MB/s
DQ Read 855
DQ Write 391
DQ Mixed 606
454% 618 MB/s
Poor: 237%
This bench: 303%
Great: 518%
NORELSYS 1081CS1 4GB
1GB free, PID 1081
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 17.9
Write 5.2
Mixed 4.2
9% 9.1 MB/s
4K Read 3.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
12% 1.07 MB/s
Samsung S2 Portable 500GB
457GB free, PID 1f05
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 57.9
Write 27
Mixed 31.6
44% 38.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
61% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 11% Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron MTC4C10163S1SC48BA1 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
96.1% Outstanding
MC Read 46.6
MC Write 24
MC Mixed 38.5
104% 36.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.7
SC Write 32.2
SC Mixed 22
67% 23.3 GB/s
Latency 98.2
41% 98.2 ns
Poor: 104%
This bench: 96.1%
Great: 139%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 53 165 16" 1280 720 BOE0A1F
Typical 82TD Builds (Compare 538 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 125%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 106%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 139%
UFO

System: Lenovo 82TD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback