Today's hottest deals

bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics54.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive29.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardMicrosoft Virtual Machine
Memory4 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220406
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 10 '23 at 19:45
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 4500 6-Core
None, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
81.4% Excellent
Memory 72.1
1-Core 134
2-Core 265
84% 157 Pts
4-Core 520
8-Core 535
70% 528 Pts
64-Core 550
34% 550 Pts
Poor: 81%
This bench: 81.4%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 6GB
Device(0000 0000)
Driver: Ver. 10.0.22621.1
Performing below potential (68th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
54.7% Above average
Lighting 68.4
Reflection 70.7
Parallax 64
56% 67.7 fps
MRender 57.5
Gravity 67.6
Splatting 66.1
53% 63.7 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 59%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Microsoft Virtual Disk 129GB
96GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 48 70 68 39 89 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
29.4% Poor
Read 292
Write 171
Mixed 206
SusWrite 66
41% 184 MB/s
4K Read 9.8
4K Write 14
4K Mixed 8.8
34% 10.9 MB/s
DQ Read 112
DQ Write 44.1
DQ Mixed 25.4
33% 60.5 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 29.4%
Great: 82%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Microsoft Corporation None Corporation None 8GB
0, 0 MHz
1024, 7168 MB
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
93.1% Outstanding
MC Read 38.9
MC Write 29.6
MC Mixed 35.1
99% 34.5 GB/s
SC Read 20.2
SC Write 30.7
SC Mixed 24
71% 25 GB/s
Latency 88.5
45% 88.5 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 93.1%
Great: 118%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 20 176 6 60 21.7" 1280 720 PSCCDD0 ParsecVDA
Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,943 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback