Today's hottest deals

Biostar A320MH 2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive54.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardBiostar A320MH 2.0  (all builds)
Memory10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220505
Uptime1 Days
Run DateNov 10 '23 at 09:43
Run Duration173 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G-$60
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
70% Very good
Memory 71.2
1-Core 106
2-Core 222
73% 133 Pts
4-Core 397
8-Core 401
53% 399 Pts
64-Core 399
25% 399 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 70%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
MSI(1462 8A9F) 2GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 471.41
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
5.1% Terrible
Lighting 6.2
Reflection 4.1
Parallax 7
5% 5.77 fps
MRender 4
Gravity 7.3
Splatting 7.2
5% 6.17 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.1%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Netac 1TB 1TB
785GB free (System drive)
Firmware: W0201A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.1 1.6 1.4 1.5 1.3 1.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
54.4% Above average
Read 442
Write 354
Mixed 371
SusWrite 1.4
65% 292 MB/s
4K Read 27.2
4K Write 77.1
4K Mixed 19.9
108% 41.4 MB/s
DQ Read 125
DQ Write 94.5
DQ Mixed 0.1
30% 73.2 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 54.4%
Great: 104%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
40.1% Average
MC Read 14.2
MC Write 13.1
MC Mixed 13.1
38% 13.5 GB/s
SC Read 14
SC Write 13.7
SC Mixed 14.2
40% 14 GB/s
Latency 96.9
41% 96.9 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 21.5" 1280 720 SAM0D1A S22F350
Typical A320MH 2.0 Builds (Compare 135 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Biostar A320MH 2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $85
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $143
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $315Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback