Today's hottest deals

Asus Z97-P

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 57%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics82% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive49.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus Z97-P  (all builds)
Memory10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160311
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 08 '23 at 17:11
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 38%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4460-$194
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
66.9% Good
Memory 83
1-Core 83.4
2-Core 166
65% 111 Pts
4-Core 295
8-Core 300
40% 298 Pts
64-Core 294
18% 294 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 66.9%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Frankenstein
Nvidia(10DE 0000) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 546.08
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
82% Excellent
Lighting 103
Reflection 140
Parallax 90.8
84% 111 fps
MRender 132
Gravity 85.3
Splatting 76.7
78% 98.1 fps
Poor: 82%
This bench: 82%
Great: 102%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 480GB-$250
240GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 603ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 180 189 185 186 168 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
49.4% Average
Read 317
Write 214
Mixed 250
SusWrite 176
54% 239 MB/s
4K Read 20.3
4K Write 16.3
4K Mixed 18.1
63% 18.2 MB/s
DQ Read 213
DQ Write 83.6
DQ Mixed 95.2
84% 131 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 65%
Plextor PX-128S3C 128GB
119GB free
Firmware: 1.03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 158 99 100 100 100 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
77.8% Very good
Read 445
Write 279
Mixed 364
SusWrite 114
67% 300 MB/s
4K Read 24.7
4K Write 73.3
4K Mixed 37.6
124% 45.2 MB/s
DQ Read 294
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 243
204% 293 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 77.8%
Great: 92%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$40
292GB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 177 176 171 178 176 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
89.6% Excellent
Read 138
Write 152
Mixed 24.6
SusWrite 174
88% 122 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.6
149% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 89.6%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-054.A00LF 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
58% Above average
MC Read 21.1
MC Write 22.4
MC Mixed 18.1
59% 20.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 16.8
SC Mixed 18.5
47% 16.6 GB/s
Latency 78.1
51% 78.1 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 58%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 57 60 84.6" 1296 759 SAM7016 SAMSUNG
Typical Z97-P Builds (Compare 3,090 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus Z97-P - $110

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $758
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback