Today's hottest deals

Empty empty

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemEmpty empty  (all builds)
MotherboardWIBTEK H61-M HDMI2
Memory1.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
DisplayΧρώματα 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121218
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 07 '23 at 23:20
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-3220-$92
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
54.5% Above average
Memory 77.8
1-Core 79.5
2-Core 142
60% 99.7 Pts
4-Core 181
8-Core 194
25% 188 Pts
64-Core 189
12% 189 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 54.5%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)
Device(1C6C 0102) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 1% Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST3320418AS 320GB-$54
274GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC37
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 92 94 87 80 93 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
53.4% Above average
Read 98.5
Write 101
Mixed 43.7
SusWrite 87.6
60% 82.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1
159% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 53.4%
Great: 58%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$46
1.5TB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 109 114 110 113 111 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
65.9% Good
Read 119
Write 110
Mixed 65.9
SusWrite 111
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.8
173% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 65.9%
Great: 67%
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 16GB
10GB free, PID 5591
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.4 8.4 7.8 8.9 5.5 7.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
13.2% Very poor
Read 62.1
Write 15.7
Mixed 18.8
SusWrite 7.7
27% 26.1 MB/s
4K Read 10.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
39% 3.5 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.2%
Great: 37%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Team-Elite-1600 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
21.9% Poor
MC Read 7.8
MC Write 6.9
MC Mixed 6.4
20% 7.03 GB/s
SC Read 6.3
SC Write 5.5
SC Mixed 5.2
16% 5.67 GB/s
Latency 90.3
44% 90.3 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 21.9%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 32 26 0 40" 1280 720 SAM0B30 SAMSUNG
Typical empty Builds (Compare 566 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Empty empty

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $94
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback