Today's hottest deals

Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM_TUF506HM

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics0.4% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive132% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
11 months ago, 11 months ago.
SystemAsus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM_TUF506HM  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX506HM
Memory16.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220812
Uptime58.2 Days
Run DateOct 27 '23 at 04:00
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User PYF-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-11400H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
55.8% Above average
Memory 57.2
1-Core 88.1
2-Core 170
58% 105 Pts
4-Core 293
8-Core 462
46% 378 Pts
64-Core 563
35% 563 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Asus(1043 16F2) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.3413
Relative performance (0th percentile)
0.4% Terrible
Lighting 0.4
Reflection 0.7
Parallax 0.6
0% 0.57 fps
MRender 0.6
Gravity 0.9
Splatting 0.5
0% 0.67 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 0.4%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme INTEL SSDPEKNU512GZ 512GB
229GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 756 419 329 278 153 108 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
132% Outstanding
Read 1,286
Write 845
Mixed 764
SusWrite 341
180% 809 MB/s
4K Read 40.5
4K Write 56.5
4K Mixed 42.1
145% 46.4 MB/s
DQ Read 441
DQ Write 200
DQ Mixed 357
255% 333 MB/s
Poor: 99%
This bench: 132%
Great: 297%
Nvme Samsung SSD 980 1TB
691GB free
Firmware: 3B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 777 790 829 856 866 894 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
142% Outstanding
Read 991
Write 841
Mixed 866
SusWrite 835
199% 883 MB/s
4K Read 31.3
4K Write 51.3
4K Mixed 35.4
120% 39.3 MB/s
DQ Read 464
DQ Write 189
DQ Mixed 367
261% 340 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 142%
Great: 354%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F4-3200C22-32GRS 1x31GB
1 of 4 slots used
31GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
42.9% Average
MC Read 15.6
MC Write 17.7
MC Mixed 14.6
46% 16 GB/s
SC Read 9.2
SC Write 12.9
SC Mixed 9.4
30% 10.5 GB/s
Latency 155
26% 155 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 42.9%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 47 35 144 15.5" 1280 720 NCP004D
Typical ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM_TUF506HM Builds (Compare 436 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 81%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Battleship

System: Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM_TUF506HM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback