Today's hottest deals

MSI A320M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics14.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive41.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
12 months ago, 12 months ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C52
MotherboardMSI A320M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52)  (all builds)
Memory6.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230707
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 13 '23 at 12:01
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User BGD-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G-$106
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
65.3% Good
Memory 69.4
1-Core 103
2-Core 189
68% 120 Pts
4-Core 330
8-Core 515
52% 422 Pts
64-Core 552
34% 552 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 65.3%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 Graphics
AMD(1002 15D8) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 4GB, Driver: 23.8.1
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
14.6% Very poor
Lighting 18.7
Reflection 15.3
Parallax 28.9
15% 21 fps
MRender 7.9
Gravity 25.5
Splatting 15.4
13% 16.3 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 14.6%
Great: 18%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Dahua C800A SSD 120GB
7GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R1201A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 44 30 30 34 38 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
41.4% Average
Read 427
Write 106
Mixed 86.9
SusWrite 39.1
36% 165 MB/s
4K Read 17.2
4K Write 26.7
4K Mixed 14.1
58% 19.3 MB/s
DQ Read 127
DQ Write 65.7
DQ Mixed 25.7
38% 72.7 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 41.4%
Great: 92%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A2K43EB1-CWE 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
49.5% Average
MC Read 19.7
MC Write 16.3
MC Mixed 16.6
50% 17.5 GB/s
SC Read 16.5
SC Write 15.4
SC Mixed 16.1
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 128
31% 128 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 1: 0P 0R 0G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
1% 11% 9 169 59 73 21.7" 1536 841 DEL2005 D1918H
Typical A320M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52) Builds (Compare 3,109 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: MSI A320M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $270
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback