Today's hottest deals

Amazon g4dn.xlarge

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics74.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive5.62% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAmazon g4dn.xlarge  (all builds)
MotherboardAmazon
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display2560 x 1282 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171016
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 10 '23 at 17:42
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 25%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon Platinum 8259CL
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
45.8% Average
Memory 59.4
1-Core 79.1
2-Core 134
53% 90.8 Pts
4-Core 188
8-Core 186
25% 187 Pts
64-Core 191
12% 191 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Tesla T4
Nvidia(10DE 12A2) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1590 MHz, MLim: 2500 MHz, Ram: 15GB, Driver: 537.13
Performing below potential (53rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
74.1% Very good
Lighting 86.1
Reflection 116
Parallax 104
70% 102 fps
MRender 106
Gravity 92.8
Splatting 100
82% 99.7 fps
Poor: 60%
This bench: 74.1%
Great: 80%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Amazon Elastic B 81GB
36GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.4 19 21 16 21 28 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
5.62% Terrible
Read 24.7
Write 47.7
Mixed 37.3
SusWrite 18.4
7% 32 MB/s
4K Read 3.1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 3.8
11% 3.2 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 5.62%
Great: 22%
Nvme Amazon EC2 NVMe 125GB
116GB free
Firmware: 0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 155 155 155 155 155 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
77.6% Very good
Read 565
Write 260
Mixed 468
SusWrite 158
81% 363 MB/s
4K Read 21.9
4K Write 63.1
4K Mixed 34.6
111% 39.9 MB/s
DQ Read 263
DQ Write 212
DQ Mixed 281
198% 252 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 77.6%
Great: 105%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x16GB
1 of 1 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2933 MHz
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
27.7% Poor
MC Read 10.2
MC Write 10.7
MC Mixed 9.2
29% 10 GB/s
SC Read 5.7
SC Write 5.9
SC Mixed 5.4
16% 5.67 GB/s
Latency 127
32% 127 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 27.7%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 23 4 60 29.7" 1280 720 NVD0000 NVIDIA VGX
Typical g4dn.xlarge Builds (Compare 20 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

System: Amazon g4dn.xlarge

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback