| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
| Graphics | 0.55% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Run History
8 years ago, 8 years ago.
| System | Asus F5SL (all builds) |
| Motherboard | ASUSTeK F5SL |
| Memory | 1.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz |
| Display | 1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colores |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20080901 |
| Uptime | 0.5 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 09 '16 at 23:16 |
| Run Duration | 174 Seconds |
| Run User | ESP-User |
| Background CPU | 2% |
PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
31.9%
Below average
|
32% 48.2 Pts
|
8% 62.2 Pts
|
4% 62.5 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3400
Asus(1043 19E2) 256MB
Driver: atiumd64.dll Ver. 8.632.1.2000
|
0.55%
Terrible
|
0% 0.91 fps
|
1% 0.78 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
136GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
||||
|
WD Elements 1048 1.5TB
924GB free, PID 1048
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
|
11.1%
Very poor
|
24% 19.1 MB/s
|
52% 0.66 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM SDRAM
|
11.1%
Very poor
|
9% 3.23 GB/s
|
11% 3.77 GB/s
|
27% 148 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical F5SL Builds (Compare 24 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Asus F5SL
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core2 Duo T5750Intel $99Bench 32%, 2,050 samples | 4x |
| Core2 Duo T9400Intel $55Bench 39%, 3,295 samples | 3x |
| Core2 Duo T5450Intel $89Bench 31%, 1,321 samples | 3x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 42% - Average | Total price: $99 |