Today's hottest deals

Asus PRIME H270-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics28.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive86% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus PRIME H270-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory54.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210713
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateOct 04 '23 at 10:07
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU 33%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700-$113
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
75.6% Very good
Memory 79.4
1-Core 112
2-Core 207
75% 133 Pts
4-Core 387
8-Core 611
61% 499 Pts
64-Core 599
37% 599 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 75.6%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 85C6) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
28.7% Poor
Lighting 36
Reflection 40.8
Parallax 37.7
29% 38.2 fps
MRender 37.4
Gravity 38.4
Splatting 27.5
28% 34.4 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 28.7%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Geil N3L SATA 512GB
351GB free (System drive)
Firmware: W0413A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 394 395 399 414 410 407 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
86% Excellent
Read 469
Write 387
Mixed 393
SusWrite 403
93% 413 MB/s
4K Read 31.8
4K Write 71.3
4K Mixed 21.3
113% 41.5 MB/s
DQ Read 102
DQ Write 314
DQ Mixed 34.2
76% 150 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 86%
Great: 86%
Fanxiang S100PRO 1TB
954GB free
Firmware: SN12605
SusWrite @10s intervals: 415 400 401 413 408 406 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
92% Outstanding
Read 429
Write 419
Mixed 398
SusWrite 407
93% 413 MB/s
4K Read 32.1
4K Write 63.8
4K Mixed 32.4
124% 42.8 MB/s
DQ Read 268
DQ Write 275
DQ Mixed 281
209% 275 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 92%
Great: 97%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$46
1.5TB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 21 17 24 31 24 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
23.3% Poor
Read 57.4
Write 84.3
Mixed 32.7
SusWrite 23.5
36% 49.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.1
36% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 23.3%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
75.6% Very good
MC Read 27.3
MC Write 29.5
MC Mixed 25.1
78% 27.3 GB/s
SC Read 15.6
SC Write 28.1
SC Mixed 21.4
62% 21.7 GB/s
Latency 80.6
50% 80.6 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 75.6%
Great: 140%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 27" 1280 720 DEL4080 DELL U2713HM
Typical PRIME H270-PLUS Builds (Compare 2,973 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus PRIME H270-PLUS - $3,094

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $3,410
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback