Today's hottest deals

HP EliteDesk 800 G1 SFF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics14.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive23.5% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP EliteDesk 800 G1 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1998
Memory9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs, 1360 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190417
Uptime15.8 Days
Run DateSep 28 '23 at 18:57
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4570-$65
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
64.9% Good
Memory 82.4
1-Core 91.6
2-Core 177
68% 117 Pts
4-Core 280
8-Core 255
36% 267 Pts
64-Core 222
14% 222 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 64.9%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
Gigabyte(1458 375C) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
14.2% Very poor
Lighting 17.7
Reflection 17.7
Parallax 18.1
14% 17.8 fps
MRender 15.3
Gravity 18.4
Splatting 16.4
14% 16.7 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.2%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
FTM56N325H 256GB
61GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1128B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.7 167 11 41 14 44 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
23.5% Poor
Read 450
Write 382
Mixed 8
SusWrite 47.5
49% 222 MB/s
4K Read 4.7
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 0.1
10% 3.23 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 23.5%
Great: 88%
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$26
14GB free
Firmware: 01.03E01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 54 60 59 58 62 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
34.2% Below average
Read 59.8
Write 56.1
Mixed 41
SusWrite 59
40% 54 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
149% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 34.2%
Great: 58%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$20
25GB free
Firmware: 18.01H18
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 81 87 89 86 88 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
47.7% Average
Read 79.7
Write 73.2
Mixed 56.9
SusWrite 86.5
55% 74.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 1 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 Samsung M378B5173QH0-CK0 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 Samsung M378B5173QH0-CK0 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
55.4% Above average
MC Read 19.3
MC Write 21.2
MC Mixed 17.2
55% 19.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 18.8
SC Mixed 18.5
49% 17.2 GB/s
Latency 76.6
52% 76.6 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 55.4%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 4 217 59 0 26" 1280 720 BBY0050 NS-43D420NA20
Typical EliteDesk 800 G1 SFF Builds (Compare 6,523 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteDesk 800 G1 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $105
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $133
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback