Today's hottest deals

Sicomputer_s.p.a. K200

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing RAM
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.18% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive90.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (59%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemSicomputer_s.p.a. K200  (all builds)
MotherboardMicro-Star B365M PRO-VDH(MS-7C39)
Memory1.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190830
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateSep 21 '23 at 09:12
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 59%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8400-$90
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
74.4% Very good
Memory 76.5
1-Core 112
2-Core 226
76% 138 Pts
4-Core 405
8-Core 474
57% 440 Pts
64-Core 578
36% 578 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 74.4%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7)
MSI(1462 7C39) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
5.18% Terrible
Lighting 5.9
Reflection 6.1
Parallax 6.7
5% 6.23 fps
MRender 0.2
Gravity 7.7
Splatting 11.5
6% 6.47 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.18%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LH480HAHQ-00005 480GB
206GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HXT7104Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 418 427 430 415 350 373 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
90.1% Outstanding
Read 342
Write 319
Mixed 333
SusWrite 402
79% 349 MB/s
4K Read 24.5
4K Write 82
4K Mixed 29.6
118% 45.4 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 336
DQ Mixed 346
262% 352 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 90.1%
Great: 122%
Kingston SEDC500M960G 960GB
476GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 37 36 37 35 35 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
24.6% Poor
Read 49.6
Write 33.3
Mixed 32.7
SusWrite 35.5
28% 37.8 MB/s
4K Read 2.3
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 1.2
238% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 24.6%
Great: 25%

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 52 60 23.8" 1280 720 CTX0000 NI24
Typical K200 Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Sicomputer_s.p.a. K200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 112% - Outstanding Total price: $90
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback