Today's hottest deals

Acer Nitro AN515-54

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (2nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 98 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 19.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot Drive65.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (95%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
13 months ago, 13 months ago.
SystemAcer Nitro AN515-54  (all builds)
MotherboardCFL Octavia_CFS
Memory28.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20191025
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 20 '23 at 06:08
Run Duration173 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 95%

 PC Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
19.5% Very poor
Memory 26.5
1-Core 15.6
2-Core 29.5
16% 23.9 Pts
4-Core 70.4
8-Core 89.9
10% 80.2 Pts
64-Core 132
8% 132 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 19.5%
Great: 80%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Micron_2200_MTFD 256GB
175GB free (System drive)
Firmware: A003 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 698 956 926 986 887 930 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
65.2% Good
Read 139
Write 175
Mixed 139
SusWrite 897
77% 338 MB/s
4K Read 4.4
4K Write 7.6
4K Mixed 4.2
16% 5.4 MB/s
Poor: 114%
This bench: 65.2%
Great: 208%
Lexar 240GB SSD 240GB
156GB free
Firmware: SN07656
SusWrite @10s intervals: 310 396 350 352 350 347 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
33.7% Below average
Read 85.1
Write 70.8
Mixed 77.5
SusWrite 351
33% 146 MB/s
4K Read 2.5
4K Write 8.2
4K Mixed 4.9
14% 5.2 MB/s
DQ Read 76.8
DQ Write 118
DQ Mixed 98
74% 97.6 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 33.7%
Great: 96%
Nvme KINGSTON SNVS/1T 1TB
227GB free
Firmware: 13A0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 785 1049 1053 1000 968 1096 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HX426S15IB2/16 059B 32GB
2667, 2667 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
50.9% Above average
MC Read 17.3
MC Write 24.9
MC Mixed 19.5
59% 20.6 GB/s
SC Read 1.5
SC Write 9.2
SC Mixed 5.2
15% 5.3 GB/s
Latency 146
27% 146 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 50 15 0 0" 1280 720
Typical Nitro AN515-54 Builds (Compare 12,237 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Nitro AN515-54

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback