Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-H510M H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.68% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive98.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H510M H  (all builds)
Memory10.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210618
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateSep 01 '23 at 12:31
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-11400-$129
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
78% Very good
Memory 50.6
1-Core 152
2-Core 296
85% 166 Pts
4-Core 564
8-Core 848
88% 706 Pts
64-Core 1,082
67% 1,082 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 78%
Great: 101%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 730
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1273
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
3.68% Terrible
Lighting 6.4
Reflection 13.4
Parallax 8
5% 9.27 fps
MRender 1
Gravity 1.6
Splatting 0.2
1% 0.93 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 3.68%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$40
191GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR032
SusWrite @10s intervals: 376 385 386 386 353 328 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
98.3% Outstanding
Read 472
Write 415
Mixed 406
SusWrite 369
94% 416 MB/s
4K Read 31.1
4K Write 68.2
4K Mixed 39.9
134% 46.4 MB/s
DQ Read 368
DQ Write 307
DQ Mixed 280
226% 319 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 98.3%
Great: 125%
Netac NVMe SSD 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: H230406a Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2016 2035 2044 2052 1753 1772 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
321% Outstanding
Read 2,172
Write 2,026
Mixed 1,911
SusWrite 1,945
454% 2,014 MB/s
4K Read 50.2
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 65.6
217% 74.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,186
DQ Write 970
DQ Mixed 1,047
792% 1,068 MB/s
Poor: 167%
This bench: 321%
Great: 520%
WD Elements 500GB
390GB free, PID 10a2
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 101
Write 100
Mixed 61.3
109% 87.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.8
107% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 10% Great: 41%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Essencore Limited KD4AGUA8A-32N220A 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
31.4% Below average
MC Read 11.4
MC Write 13.7
MC Mixed 9.5
33% 11.5 GB/s
SC Read 5.3
SC Write 10.4
SC Mixed 6.3
21% 7.33 GB/s
Latency 159
25% 159 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 31.4%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 22 1 60 19" 1296 1024 GSM4B85 L1942
Typical GA-H510M H Builds (Compare 7,343 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H510M H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $269
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback