Today's hottest deals

Asus PRIME A520M-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics44.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive79.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus PRIME A520M-K  (all builds)
Memory4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210201
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 24 '23 at 01:55
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User EGY-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$88
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
87.8% Excellent
Memory 78.4
1-Core 138
2-Core 266
88% 161 Pts
4-Core 522
8-Core 807
82% 665 Pts
64-Core 1,012
63% 1,012 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 87.8%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$150
Asus(1043 87A7) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 536.40
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
44.1% Average
Lighting 55.1
Reflection 79.5
Parallax 51.4
45% 62 fps
MRender 63.5
Gravity 49.8
Splatting 45.6
42% 53 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
P3-128 128GB
57GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN08979
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 108 107 109 107 97 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
79.3% Very good
Read 482
Write 236
Mixed 173
SusWrite 106
55% 249 MB/s
4K Read 38.2
4K Write 93.9
4K Mixed 40.3
159% 57.5 MB/s
DQ Read 116
DQ Write 106
DQ Mixed 114
85% 112 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 79.3%
Great: 96%
Toshiba MQ01ABF050 500GB-$32
62GB free
Firmware: AM0P2A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 84 84 84 84 84 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
41.2% Average
Read 59.9
Write 64.2
Mixed 28.1
SusWrite 83.4
43% 58.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
104% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 41.2%
Great: 60%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$20
204GB free
Firmware: 18.01H18
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 71 71 72 71 70 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
39.1% Below average
Read 65.4
Write 62.7
Mixed 48.8
SusWrite 70.6
46% 61.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
130% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 39.1%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4DFRA32A.C8FR 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
61% Good
MC Read 23.2
MC Write 20.7
MC Mixed 19.2
60% 21 GB/s
SC Read 20.9
SC Write 21.8
SC Mixed 20.2
60% 21 GB/s
Latency 83.5
48% 83.5 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 61%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 19: 0P 2R 1G 6B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
19% 12% 73 219 60 60 21.5" 1920 1080 DELA0D9 DELL P2217H
Typical PRIME A520M-K Builds (Compare 1,606 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A520M-K

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $160
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback