Today's hottest deals

Asus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 103%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 119%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics118% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING  (all builds)
Memory32.4 GB free of 48 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200401
Uptime4.1 Days
Run DateAug 11 '23 at 15:54
Run Duration167 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 3700X How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$330
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
86.7% Excellent
Memory 70.8
1-Core 140
2-Core 273
86% 161 Pts
4-Core 549
8-Core 1037
94% 793 Pts
64-Core 2,078
129% 2,078 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 86.7%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$275
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 527.56
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
118% Outstanding
Lighting 155
Reflection 154
Parallax 154
126% 154 fps
MRender 191
Gravity 132
Splatting 118
117% 147 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 118%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$170
45GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,589
Write 1,467
Mixed 1,013
370% 1,690 MB/s
4K Read 51
4K Write 156
4K Mixed 66.3
245% 91.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,330
DQ Write 851
DQ Mixed 1,171
851% 1,118 MB/s
Poor: 195% Great: 393%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$60
39GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,395
Write 1,723
Mixed 1,524
416% 1,881 MB/s
4K Read 58.7
4K Write 143
4K Mixed 81.3
269% 94.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,390
DQ Write 1,204
DQ Mixed 1,260
955% 1,285 MB/s
Poor: 178% Great: 346%
Samsung 870 EVO 2TB-$170
876GB free
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 411 407 420 430 435 438 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 474
Write 431
Mixed 418
SusWrite 423
98% 437 MB/s
4K Read 38.9
4K Write 75.1
4K Mixed 49.8
162% 54.6 MB/s
DQ Read 217
DQ Write 183
DQ Mixed 197
148% 199 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 105%
Great: 136%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$35
30GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 104 106 106 106 105 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
62.1% Good
Read 111
Write 124
Mixed 71.1
SusWrite 105
76% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
159% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 62.1%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4-3600C18-16GTZN F4-3600C16-8GTZNC F4-3600C18-16GTZN F4-3600C16-8GTZNC 48GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 8192, 16384, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
72.2% Very good
MC Read 27.6
MC Write 26.1
MC Mixed 25.4
75% 26.4 GB/s
SC Read 20.3
SC Write 17.6
SC Mixed 23.9
59% 20.6 GB/s
Latency 99.4
40% 99.4 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 60 21.5" 1280 720 HPN3575 HP 22m
Typical ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING Builds (Compare 8,419 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING - $499

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $1,595
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback