Today's hottest deals

Asus P8H77-M

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive65.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus P8H77-M  (all builds)
Memory4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140307
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 09 '23 at 16:54
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
73% Very good
Memory 94.5
1-Core 96.6
2-Core 189
75% 127 Pts
4-Core 297
8-Core 316
40% 306 Pts
64-Core 301
19% 301 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 73%
Great: 75%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Gigabyte SSD 240GB-$27
174GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFMJ1.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 366 33 36 36 36 32 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
65.5% Good
Read 357
Write 385
Mixed 344
SusWrite 90
66% 294 MB/s
4K Read 25.2
4K Write 57.4
4K Mixed 32
110% 38.2 MB/s
DQ Read 217
DQ Write 309
DQ Mixed 184
161% 237 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 65.5%
Great: 91%
WL200GLSA854G 200GB
123GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 57 55 54 53 57 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
33.7% Below average
Read 61.9
Write 58.7
Mixed 42.4
SusWrite 55
40% 54.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.6
120% 1 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 33.7%
Great: 56%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
34.4% Below average
MC Read 11.2
MC Write 11.2
MC Mixed 10.1
31% 10.8 GB/s
SC Read 10.3
SC Write 10.7
SC Mixed 9.8
29% 10.3 GB/s
Latency 58.5
68% 58.5 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 34.4%
Great: 35%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 57 60 0" 1280 720
Typical P8H77-M Builds (Compare 961 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P8H77-M - $70

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $451
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback