Today's hottest deals

Default string

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics5.02% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive57.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
14 months ago, 14 months ago.
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardDefault Default string
Memory24.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210823
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 04 '23 at 20:09
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
41.6% Average
Memory 37.3
1-Core 62.7
2-Core 127
41% 75.7 Pts
4-Core 247
8-Core 365
38% 306 Pts
64-Core 380
24% 380 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Mobile Skylake)
Intel(8086 2112) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
5.02% Terrible
Lighting 5.6
Reflection 5
Parallax 6
5% 5.53 fps
MRender 6.6
Gravity 5.4
Splatting 8.9
6% 6.97 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.02%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ngff 2280 2TB SSD
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP3414B5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 334 350 371 328 303 309 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
57.7% Above average
Read 327
Write 290
Mixed 271
SusWrite 332
69% 305 MB/s
4K Read 18.2
4K Write 34.7
4K Mixed 6.7
54% 19.9 MB/s
DQ Read 169
DQ Write 229
DQ Mixed 14
62% 137 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 1x31GB
1 of 4 slots used
31GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
27.4% Poor
MC Read 9.3
MC Write 12
MC Mixed 9.5
29% 10.3 GB/s
SC Read 3.3
SC Write 9.6
SC Mixed 5.4
17% 6.1 GB/s
Latency 215
19% 215 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 27.4%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 15.5" 1536 864 BOE0B07
Typical string Builds (Compare 15,299 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Excellent Total price: $84
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $133
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback