Today's hottest deals

User System

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics38% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive83.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemKLLISRE
MotherboardKLLISRE E5-X99
Memory10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230522
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 04 '23 at 04:32
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
70.8% Very good
Memory 82.1
1-Core 82
2-Core 154
63% 106 Pts
4-Core 320
8-Core 628
56% 474 Pts
64-Core 1,216
75% 1,216 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 70.8%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-2048SP
AMD(1002 0B31) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1284 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.20.27.09
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
38% Below average
Lighting 44.3
Reflection 59
Parallax 68.1
36% 57.1 fps
MRender 59.2
Gravity 53.5
Splatting 43.8
42% 52.2 fps
Poor: 33%
This bench: 38%
Great: 47%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Mushkin MKNSSDRW960GB 960GB
841GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1231A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 409 405 413 428 432 433 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
83.7% Excellent
Read 481
Write 416
Mixed 398
SusWrite 420
96% 428 MB/s
4K Read 23.9
4K Write 55.3
4K Mixed 23.2
95% 34.1 MB/s
DQ Read 124
DQ Write 326
DQ Mixed 48.8
88% 166 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 83.7%
Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (57th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
65.6% Good
MC Read 30.4
MC Write 22.9
MC Mixed 20.1
70% 24.5 GB/s
SC Read 11.1
SC Write 14.8
SC Mixed 15.4
39% 13.8 GB/s
Latency 76.7
52% 76.7 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 65.6%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 43 7 60 23.8" 1920 1009 ACR0704 VG240Y P
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback