Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 116%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Boot Drive248% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory53 GB free of 64 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230317
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJul 29 '23 at 13:42
Run Duration280 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D-$599
AM5, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 4.4 GHz, turbo 5.05 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Memory 79.6
1-Core 204
2-Core 407
119% 230 Pts
4-Core 811
8-Core 1,575
142% 1,193 Pts
64-Core 2,714
168% 2,714 Pts
Poor: 103%
This bench: 116%
Great: 124%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6950-XT
Asus(1043 0504) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 22.40.02.02
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 254
Reflection 264
Parallax 543
207% 354 fps
Gravity 222
Splatting 348
261% 285 fps
Poor: 183% Great: 214%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
186GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 672 512 496 491 486 482 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
248% Outstanding
Read 2501
Write 2,345
Mixed 1,606
SusWrite 523
389% 1,744 MB/s
4K Read 55.7
4K Write 141
4K Mixed 75.1
256% 90.7 MB/s
DQ Read 860
DQ Write 792
DQ Mixed 807
611% 820 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 248%
Great: 340%
WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB-$135
1.5TB free
Firmware: 620311WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4244 4276 3670 2321 2062 1840 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
488% Outstanding
Read 4,180
Write 4,414
Mixed 3168
SusWrite 3069
834% 3,708 MB/s
4K Read 62.1
4K Write 170
4K Mixed 79.1
286% 104 MB/s
DQ Read 1,083
DQ Write 950
DQ Mixed 1,016
762% 1,016 MB/s
Poor: 293%
This bench: 488%
Great: 666%
WD Blue SN570 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB
714GB free
Firmware: 234110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1447 572 580 566 580 570 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
232% Outstanding
Read 2,082
Write 2,269
Mixed 1917
SusWrite 719
392% 1,747 MB/s
4K Read 49.7
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 63.9
216% 74.9 MB/s
DQ Read 897
DQ Write 812
DQ Mixed 840
634% 850 MB/s
Poor: 159%
This bench: 232%
Great: 300%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 2TB-$21
700GB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 156 157 155 156 157 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
89.4% Excellent
Read 155
Write 139
Mixed 28.1
SusWrite 156
86% 119 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 1.9
353% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 89.4%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMT64GX5M2X5600C40 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 5600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
206% Outstanding
MC Read 103
MC Write 63
MC Mixed 68.2
223% 77.9 GB/s
SC Read 49.3
SC Write 62.5
SC Mixed 58.2
162% 56.7 GB/s
Latency 81.2
49% 81.2 ns
Poor: 142%
This bench: 206%
Great: 206%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 144 27" 1280 720 AUS2705 VG27AQL1A
Typical TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS Builds (Compare 139 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 413%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 419%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $2,464
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback