Today's hottest deals

Acer Aspire A315-53G

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.86% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
14 months ago, 14 months ago.
SystemAcer Aspire A315-53G  (all builds)
MotherboardKBL Metapod_KL
Memory5.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190522
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJul 26 '23 at 23:18
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User PER-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
49.5% Average
Memory 61.9
1-Core 68
2-Core 131
51% 87.1 Pts
4-Core 220
8-Core 198
28% 209 Pts
64-Core 200
12% 200 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
Acer(1025 1295) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7261
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
4.86% Terrible
Lighting 5.6
Reflection 3.9
Parallax 5.7
5% 5.07 fps
MRender 5
Gravity 5.6
Splatting 8.5
5% 6.37 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.86%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
630GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ACM2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.4 8.7 9.4 8.1 8.6 10 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 15% Great: 71%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9
27GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.5 2 2.4 2.5 6.5 7.4 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
20.8% Poor
Read 102
Write 4.2
Mixed 12
SusWrite 4.2
25% 30.5 MB/s
4K Read 21.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
80% 7.23 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 20.8%
Great: 28%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G3B1 Kingston 99U5700-027.A00G 12GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
38.2% Below average
MC Read 14.5
MC Write 14.3
MC Mixed 13.2
40% 14 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 8.9
SC Mixed 9.8
25% 8.9 GB/s
Latency 122
33% 122 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 38.2%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 44 8 60 15.5" 1280 720 CMN15DC
Typical Aspire A315-53G Builds (Compare 633 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire A315-53G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $78
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback